Holistic Profile of 3 and a Half Years Old Girl Essay

Holistic Profile of 3 and a Half Years sure-enough(a) Girl - Essay ExamplePhysical developmentAfter a long interview with Mrs. Davies and her third and a fractional years old miss I learnt the following about this child. My interview include questions about the child right from infancy so that I could have a clear experience of the childs development right from birth. The stick informed me that the daughter started demonstrating intelligence at the get along of six months this she did by motor activity and could not use symbols. My interview revealed that the child had departed through the sensorimotor stage without either complexity.The child was now in her pre-operational stage, this is a period which comprises ii sub-stages where a child demonstrates intelligence through using symbols development of imaginations is achieved, skills in language use atomic number 18 fully acquired and lastly the child lacks memory such that it is very hard for him to remember something. Thinking is consequently d unmatchable in a manner that is not logical. (Piaget,1972).By both observing the three and half years old Dan and gathering information from her mother I arrived at the following fleshly observations. According to the mother her mother informed me that her daughter sleeps for about twelve hours at night. This has been consistent but in case the child is not in good health then he capacity sleep for fewer hours. The child is larn on how to use the toilet but with the assistance of the wield giver and at times with the mothers assistance. She as well as knows how to put on shoes by herself though she evictnot tie the shoe races on her own. I provided the young girl with a big clod which she repeatedly threw overhead and kicking it up and down in a jovial mood. On several(prenominal) instances the child was making efforts in trying to catch the large ball.The child was hopping and down on one foot a thing that she appeared to enjoy most. She also demo nstrated developed balancing skills while stand up and walking on a straight line.At times Dan would stop whatever she was doing and would start reflection whatever we were doing. In several occasions she tried to imitate us after carefully observing our activities.The child had already developed the full set of babies teeth with her appearance resembling that of an adult though sleazy (adult-like appearance)After weighing the three and a half years old I noted that Dan weighed cardinal eight pounds. This was a good weight considering her age and the current stage of development. According to the mother her daughter remained asleep in most nights while recording minimal cases of wetting the bed. (Piaget, 1972)Her child knows how to dress herself and the except assistance that she requires is on how to use the buttons and also zippers. She gets the required assistance from the caregiver and has been improving on matters concerning cover herself.The child also knows how to feed on her own. This she does with lots of spilling but this is reducing as time goes. She also climbs up and down a small slide by herself and at the same time she can ride a small bicycle without experiencing many problems in using the pedalsThrough the interview with the mother I learnt that her daughter is much interested in the handling of food and also in learning the cooking procedures.she repeatedly peters the house help claiming tat she want to do some cooking.She has the ability of washout her hands, getting a drink on her own and can also brush her teeth without any difficulty. She knows how to butter bread using a knife and can also

Study case (Information Resources Management) Essay - 5

Study part (Information Resources Management) - Essay ExampleThe two should start with a baseline understanding of all the items of IT that the company spends its money. afterward identification, they should focus on helping the company develop strategies that entrust help focus on the highest prise spending from the standpoint of supporting the business units (Rabin 202). The outgrowth pass on involve an understanding of the ITs component to the business units that posed as intermittent and contentious in the past. They should aim at creating a process to start a dialogue between IT and the business units.The CIO should ask the consultant to help him in compend of the portfolio and budgeting, provision of discipline and structure that enables him to sort through and get to the business cases for IT spending (Law 307). The CIO should develop insights that will enable the business leading and the IT management to put up processes that will lead to IT priority agreements. It w ill also enable the process of creation of a detailed, pragmatic and dynamic view of key IT initiatives and objectives (Rabin 203). The CIO should pioneer strategies that will lead to development of clear, business-focused, and flexible action plans. The CIO and the IT experts should device shipway that will educate the business-unit leaders as to how IT could be directly integrated into their business plans and become a key enabler to achieve results. by from reviewing the effectiveness of the companys global IT budget, the CIO should also consider the elements of the strategic plan and device ways to effectively implement the resolutions (Rabin 204).One of the executive level decisions that can be made in arrange to influence the directions of the company is developing a CIO authority and pulling the CEO to support the authority found on consultant documentation (Law 309). Decision-making is the core of all business activities. The executives should set strategies and weigh a assortment of factors to arrive at the desired balance of risk

The Portrayal of Homosexuals in Movies Essay Example for Free

The Portrayal of Homosexuals in Movies EssayIn this paper, I will be discussing 2 delineations that demo homosexuals and homosexuality in very different looks. The first motion-picture portray is The Birdcage (1996), a funniness directed by Mike Nichols, and starring Robin Williams and Nathan Lane as a pair of huge-term queer lovers. The second movie is Brokeback Mountain (2005), a drama directed by Ang Lee, and starring Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhaal as star-crossed brisk lovers. A Movie Filled with StereotypesIn The Birdcage (1996), the movie that I choose chosen that I feel stereotypes homosexuals, either the typical airy stereotypes are in that location the flamboyant physical gestures, the garish color scheme of the decor and the wardrobe, the hysterical emotional reactions, the drag queens, the cattiness, and compensate the lisps. In brief, Robin Williams plays Armand Goldman, a middle-aged fairylike man who is the owner of a aerial social club in Miam i. His live-in lover, Albert, played by Nathan Lane, is withal the star of the cabaret show, a drag queen named Starina.Armand has a 20-year-old son, Val, from a brief heterosexual relationship, and Val has been raised in Armand and Alberts household. Val arrives home, declares that hes engaged to the lady friend of an extremely right-wing conservative U. S. senator, and that the senator and his wife are coming to dinner. Albert decides to dress in drag and lay fell to be Armands wife. The garish decor and wardrobe, which might enclothetlem erupt of place if the setting were Wisconsin or Kansas, doesnt seem rather as stereotypical as it might since the setting is South shore in Miami.The bright, neon colors are quite popular there, and although there is certainly an ele custodyt of exaggeration, I dont remember these colors would be out of place in mainstream Miami. What is really raise about this bring is that even though it is filled with so many gay stereotypes, and ev en though it gets huge laughs playing to these stereotypes, it is really non a film that refuses to look deeper than the surface. The out-and-proud Armand and Albert are in a long-term, committed relationship, and we see how that relationship plays out.Armand and Albert could be any 2 battalion in a relationship, although Armand is portray as pretty mainstream gay, minus most of the stereotypical characteristics, while Albert is loaded with these types of characteristics. In fact, he seems to be one, big overacting gay diva in every respect. He is always throwing fits, crying, accusing, locking himself in his room, and trying to lay guilt trips on Armand. I hate to say it, nevertheless non ruggedly does Lane portray Albert as the complete stereotype of a gay man, but he alike portrays Albert as the complete stereotype of a straight woman who has PMS.I think the stereotypes that are portrayed in this movie are just as popular as a set of misconceptions at present as they w ere a decade ago. But on the other hand, the biggest stereotype, the one where people gestate that all gay workforce sleep around with many, many partners, is not even addressed in this film because, as I said, it focuses generally on a committed relationship between both middle-aged gay men. This, I feel, could be beneficial in showing the public in general that not all gay men jump from man to man.On the other hand, the audience is going to see what it wants to see, and if they believe all the stereotypes going in, this film will probably reinforce their beliefs. But, at least, a gay comedy could get made at all. It doesnt happen that of ten in Hollywood. But it seems that comedy makes everything more palatable to middle America. It removes them from the truth of the situation just enough so that they can be absorbed into the stage and laugh. That has got to be a benefit, as its a start to seeing gay people as just people. A Movie with Positive ImagesBrokeback Mountain (2005 ), the movie I have chosen that I feel does not stereotype homosexuals, is about as far away from The Birdcage (1996) as you can get. Its a romantic drama with a love reputation between devil cowboys as its central theme. Ennis Del Mar, played by the late Heath Ledger, and tinkers dam Twist, played by Jake Gyllenhaal, join as young men on an isolated assignment herding sheep. Ennis is already married, but Jack is not yet married. The two surprise themselves by falling in love with each other, something that was greatly looked down on in the American West in 1963, where this film begins its story.They keep their love a secret, or so they think, and meet when they can over the years. Jack marries for cover, Ennis grows even more distant from his wife, and eventually Jack meets a violent end after his homosexuality is discovered. In looking at the effect that the images in this film had or might have on mainstream, non-gay America, Id say that the image of two virile cowboys fallin g so unexpectedly in love with each other was a unequivocal one. So many of the stereotypes show gays as effeminate and unmanly.But there was none of that in these two men. They were as strong and physically active as most men, and probably in better convention than most straight men, but the fact that they were both buff did nothing to add to the misconceptions that most gay men work out at the gym and are vain and body-oriented. Instead, their good physical forms were the results of hard manual labor. These non-stereotypical images are important to the focal point of the film, which is how the romantic relationship between these two men develops over the course of 20 years.Brokeback Mountain (2005) was really the first big-budget Hollywood movie that took the risk to portray two non-flamboyant, non-stereotypical gay men in a romantic drama, where the gay romance was the theme of the movie. Whereas both men were closeted and married, and it appeared that Jack had other boyfriends while Ennis did not, we see how their love lasts and grows over the years. We see the longing and the keen and the way they miss each other. Mainstream straight America sat up and thought, theyre just resembling us Thats how I feel about my husband, wife, boyfriend, girlfriend.We could relate to them and what they were going through. I think this reaction was a product of the times. Homosexuality is a lot more out in the open instantly and middle America is a lot more socially tolerant now than they were even ten years ago. The Comparison In maliciousness of the fact that Brokeback Mountain (2005) was made in 2005, it is set in a time period from 1963 to 1983. So what we see in Brokeback Mountain (2005) is how attitudes and social expectations used to be when America was a much more closed-off society than it is now.We actually get to see what led up to the change in American values by the time of The Birdcage (1996), which is set in 1996. Another remnant in the setting is tha t Brokeback Mountain (2005) is set in the American West, supposedly representing middle American values, whereas The Birdcage (1996) is set in South Beach Miami, known more for its nightlife than for its middle-class values. A soma of anything goes feeling pervades this setting. In South Beach, a gay man can be as safely out as it is probably possible to be in the United States.In the American West, quadruple decades ago, there were few places that it was safe to be known as homosexual. An image is created of fear and intolerance and belongings your true self hidden. In Brokeback Mountain (2005), director Ang Lee created images that were evocative and memorable. The beauty itself of Brokeback Mountain, where the two men fell in love, was all lush and green and charming vistas. Yet, when the men separated and spent long periods apart, the landscape was dry, dusty, run down and baron.It seemed that this love had just happened to them and that they had no control over it in spite of the strong yearning to be together. In The Birdcage (1996), director Mike Nichols, on the other hand, told a story that was all about a kind of false world created by his two main characters. The settings were primarily indoors, often garish with colors and styles left over from the 1980s, and literally, audibly loud. It was a world based on illusion, but the illusion was created by the two gay men and it was on their own terms.I think one product of the times in which these films were made was the number of graphic love scenes that were included. Even 13 years ago when The Birdcage (1996) was made, it was very rare to show two men necking in a mainstream Hollywood movie. But ten years later, Brokeback Mountain (2005) showed not just two men kissing, but two men in love, do love. Times have changed and what we are willing to accept up on the screen has changed with it. However, this may not be just a product of the times, but also a product of the type of film that was being made .In 1996, no one expected two gay middle-aged men to make out or to make love in a comedy, but come 2005, love scenes in a romantic drama were considered normal, although pushing the envelope quite a bit when the protagonists were both males. Conclusion When I saw Brokeback Mountain (2005), I have to concur that I was enchanted, fascinated and a little bit put off. The scenery and cinematography were typical, breathtaking Ang Lee, and the story was so beautifully done, unlike anything that had been done before. But this film also went a lot far than I was comfortable with in terms of showing physical contact between two gay men.They showed a lot of kissing and love making, and when they showed Ennis spitting on his fingers, I about lost it. I guess I consider myself a socially-tolerant prude I dont mind what people do as long as I dont have to watch it in graphic detail. In The Birdcage (1996), I thought Robin Williams did an excellent job of portraying a gay man without all the u sual stereotypical characteristics to fall back on. It could not have been an easy task, curiously for someone who can overact anyone under the table, but Williams found a nice middle maroon in portraying a man who was clearly gay but also clearly not a stereotype.However, there was one character who was purely a stereotype played for laughs all the way the butler named Agador, played by Hank Azaria. I have to admit that I thought this character, small though his role was, was the funniest part of the movie. He took just about every gay stereotype out there and exaggerated it as much as humanly possible, and he pretty much stole the show doing it, too. In addition, I was glad that we didnt have to watch two middle-aged men kissing and making love. That would have been too much for me. I guess there really is something to playing it for laughs and making the audience comfortable.You really dont want to put the audience too far out of their comfort zone or they will just simply reje ct the consentaneous premise, or the whole film, in other words. As you can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar, I believe that motion pictures can help break through to increased social tolerance by alleviation the medicine down gently. References Nichols, M. , Machlis, N. , Imperato, M. , and Danon, M. (Producers), Nichols, M. (Director). (1996) The Birdcage Motion picture. USA United Artists. Schamus, J. , McMurtry, L. , and Ossana, D. (Producers), Lee, A. (Director). (2005) Brokeback Mountain Motion picture. USA Focus Features.

Outline French Revolution Debate Essay Example for Free

Outline French gyration Debate EssayI. How do you think Louis XVIs qualities as a good attraction led to the French conversion?A. Louis XVI did non have confidence in himself, which made it impossible foranyone to have confidence in himB.A mediocre leader could run any country into debt, but only a miserable leader could let a Revolution happen that is negative for the current governmentC.Many of the people doubted him many times, and he could not fool an immaculate country into thinking the current system (Old Regime) wasnt broken and didnt need to be fixedII. In your opinion, what were the well-nigh major causes for the French Revolution?A.Old Regime1.Third estate treated ridiculously unfairly2.97% of people poor, impoverished and oppressedB.Enlightenment1.3rd Estate had inadequate no say in government2.Prior, they were told what to think3.Enlightenment made people think and rethink all aspects of society4.Challenged church and government5.Led to people taking actionC.Esta tes-General Meeting1.Gave the 3rd Estate a voice2.Led to the creation of the National Assembly3.Made the 3rd Estate realize they preserve force changeIII. How large of an impact did the Enlightenment have on the French Revolution?A.Led to former(a) things got the ball moving on the subjectB.Let people think everything over for themselves, without a government biasIV. superstar of the historians in the film called the French Revolution the crossroads of themodern world. What does this mean, do you agree with this claim?A.No, American Revolution1.Happened rough the same time, but America went through the Industrial Revolution first2.France declined after the revolution, as America skyrocketed3.America ruined a world power, France destroyed themselvesB.Still many other monarchys in place at this timeV. What benignant of leader was Robespierre? Do you think he did a good job representing theFrench people?A.Described as an incorrupt leaderB.Better leader than Louis XVIC.Became power hungry, declined at the end of his reign1.Was reason for Reign of Terror2.Killed people he was afraid ofD.Did a good job, kept the Revolution going and helped it alongVI.. Why do you think the initial goals of the Revolution became so distorted during theReign of Terror? Why do you think Robespierre had so much fear of politicaltraitors?A.Not positive(predicate) if Robespierre was for or against the RevolutionB.New issues came up over timeC.Preoccupied with fearing for your lifeD.Feared political traitors because he was greedy1.Liked being in office2.Didnt want anyone to take that by fromhim3.Could trust no oneVII. What were the most important long term effects of the French Revolution?A.Democracy in FranceB.Bastille Day

Stereotypes and Prejudice Worksheet Essay Example for Free

Stereotypes and Prejudice Worksheet EssayI soul on the whole(a)y do not think there argon many positive aspects of stereotypes. You cannot form judgments about everyone in a company based on one person. Just because one has tattoos, it doesnt mean that they are tough, scary, or delinquent. Ones excerption to have tattoos is their creative way of expressing themselves. Stereotypes and Prejudice Worksheet 2 Negative Aspects of Stereotypes Stereotypes have several negative aspects. When race are put into these groups, people judge them before getting to know them and forming opinions on what kind of person they are without even giving the person a chance. It causes people to think negatively based on someone else opinion. Stereotypes and Prejudice Defined and Their Differences A stereotype is a thought that whitethorn be select about specific types of individuals or certain ways of doing things, but that belief may or may not accurately reflect reality. Prejudice is an opinion or judgment that disregards the facts. Stereotypes are rattling mostly based on fact.. Irish like to drink fight, Southern people are all dumb, Latinos are sexy good dancers, etc. Prejudice is when people judge someone they meet based on stereotypes. The Relationship between Stereotypes and Prejudice.While they may seem similar at first they are actually quite different. Stereotyping is assuming that all people belonging to a certain group will all behave in a certain way. This is not always do with negative intentions its often do finished a lack of understanding Stereotypes and Prejudice Worksheet 3 or knowledge, and sometimes even through humor. Prejudice is displaying negative feelings or actions towards a specific group of people because of something that separates them from others, and is almost always done through hatred or fear of the thing that makes them different.Preventing Prejudice You cant prevent it entirely. But bringing up is a big thing. Helping people get to know and understand other groups and cultures. Teaching and nurture that all people are created equally. That no matter what their race, gender, religion, ethnicity or sexual orientation we are all human. Making sure that people know the effects of being prejudice causes and that it will not be tolerated. Being open-minded and do not be so quick to pass judgment.

Meaning of life, Life Essay Example for Free

inwardness of life, Life EssaySuffering is an inevit equal part of life. We both live in this big inner ear of scummy. Th that way out of the labyrinth is death. To live is to suffer, to survive to take care subject librate in the suffering. Few peopl e actually commit suicide to liberate themselves form suffering. Most people find meaning or purpo se for their life so that they have the motivation to live on. Some cerebrate that suffering turn over them wis er, nigh think that suffering is a test of faith, in that location testament be rewards for them in the after life if they c an endure the suffering on earth. Some people couldnt reckon but take for going on with their life for their loved nonpareils. Some people keep themselves lodge in to dodge from the fountainhead.My view on this question is that suffering does non make life any more than(prenominal) or any less meaningful. Beca use as an atheist, I gestate that there is no God, the world does not have a divine plan for us. Tha t the existence of life is just strictly a miraculous accident. When we die, we dampen existing. The time we spend on Earth go forth not get to anything in an afterlife in another dimension. Therefore, life i s inherently nonmeaningful, with or without injure and suffering. Human are powerless in the face of m eaninglessness .The entirely way we can mess with life is to embrace the fact that there is no intrinsic va lue in life. We can only ready our own meanings. One can create meaning of life with or without su ffering. But faultce suffering is an inhering part of our life, it more or less give us insights on mean ing of life. Dr. Bernard Rieux can outstrip exemplifies my smudge of view. When the plague got out of control and O ran was placed under quarantine, it didnt stop the dilute form battling the plague, fighting the war t hat was doomed to fail. At this point, many would wonder what is meaning of of the doctors accomplishment s when they are all in vain.The answer can be found in a dialogue he shared with Tarrou. Tarrou asked the doctor wherefore he was so committed to fighting the plague if he does not believe in G od. The doctor replied that whether or not God exist is irrelevant and he didnt have the time to thin k about what waits him in the future and what will come out of his actions. The only thing he knew that there were sick people suffering and they needed to be cured. Even though he admitted that his struggles against death would only be temporary victories and that the plague was what he referred as anendless struggle, he said that this was not the reason to give up struggle.From the dialogue, we can see the doctor was aware of the intrinsic meaninglessness of his life, bec ause he said he wouldnt waste time to think about the existence of God and what his action will lea d to him. If he deemed his life has inherent meaning, he should have thought about the supra questi ons. Thought he conside red that his life is inherently meaningless, the plague gave me the meaning. The meaning lies in the other people. The doctor was full aware that his attempts at lifting people out of misery is an impossible task as more and more people became infected and die. And there were no effective cure.Basically, his sitti ng around and doing nothing or habiliment himself off to save the patients might just possibly lead to s ame outcome. However, the doctor did not stop his work in face of his powerlessness to alter the situation. Becaus e under this situation, he was left with only two choices, ignore it or act on it. There was no third op tion. The doctor chose the later(prenominal) one because he couldnt bear to see people suffer and doing nothing about it. Its meaningless to battle the unwindable battle against the plague. It was not defeating the plague that gave meaning to the doctor. It was the people gave him meaning.It was his compassion for others that keep him going in times of suffering. From the case of Dr. Rieux and his battle against the plague, we can see similarities in the real worl d. The plague is like the amoral universe, and Dr. Rieux represents all the human beings. We are po werless in face of the meaningless of life, just as Dr. Rieux was powerless in face of the plague. But we do have a choice, we can create meanings for ourselves just as Dr. Rieux has learnt from sufferin g and found meanings in helping people. Winston Smith from 1974 1984 somewhat share some similarities with Dr.Rieux in terms of action upon the unchangeable, though he was not such a noble and heroic person as Dr. Rieux. In his case, the unchangeable was the Big Brother. Winston Smith lived in a state where every moves, every wo rds ands every thoughts he made were monitored by the Party. In the instance of living in an extrem e state where even having disloyal thought against the party is in violation of law. The meaning of li fe for Smith was not to endure a revoluti on and topple the party, and change the system entirely. Thou gh Smith had thought about it and desired it to happen. Deep down he believed that it was impossibl e to achieve the goal and sooner or later he would be arrested by the Party.Nevertheless, he set out t o challenge the limits of the Party. He unbroken a diary which has Down with the Big Brother written o n it everyplace and over again. He had an forbidden affair with Julia. Also he joined the Brotherhood whic h he believe is the enemy of the Party. I think the meaning for Smith did not lie in being the hero. What was weighty for him was to stay as human as possible. Through the rebellious acts against the Party in his own ways, he got to keep his spirit and his human side. That was the meaning he could find for himself.De go against the fact that he was exclusively compromised at last when he was brought into Room 101, where he was tortured to an extreme degree and indoctrinated to cure his rage. He was com pletely broke and dehumanised. His passionate hatred towards the Big Brother turned into absolute l oyalty and love. He should not be blamed for betraying Julia and not upholding what he believed in the first place in such extreme conditions. After all, he did try to rebel against the Big Brother even t hough buddy-buddy down he knew he couldnt do anything to overthrow the Big Brother. Dr.Rieux and Winston Smith resolved the question of meaning through their rebellious acts against the plague and the Big Brother. There are people who find suffering itself reveals the meaning of lif e. arrest Paneloux is a good example to illustrate this point of view. In his first talk addressing t he plague. He said that the plague was a punishment by God. That it was the result of the sin of all c itizens. He criticised the people for not attending church and repenting for their sins. Therefore the p lague was monitor of Gods power and the Oran residents should start to change their habits and st art to fear God again.Unlike Dr. Rieux, who is an atheist, Father Paneloux based his life and work on his christian faith. F rom a Christian point of view, everything happens on earth has purpose and fit into the grand plan o f God. Therefore, it was his job to make sense of the suffering of the plague so that he and the peopl e listening to him will be able to endure and continue to believe in God. From his interpretation of s uffering, the meaning of life for Father Panels was more easily understood than Dr. Rieux and Winst on Smith. The meaning of life was really simple, that is to serve and honour God in his will.Though he changes his view on suffering drastically after witnessing the death of an innocent child. He did not view suffering as a punishment anymore. He said that the reason why a innocent child sh ould suffer was not something that human would necessarily understand no matter how hard they tri ed. They just had to keep in mind that it was Gods will. One must keep his fai th and God and find t he good in bad situation. In spite of a changing tone, the meaning for Father Paneloux remained the same- to serve God.To conclude, life itself is inherently meaningless. Not even religious belief can provide an universal answer to the meaning of life. There are no answers for that and never will be. Suffering does not make one s life meaningful. But through suffering one might find meanings in life and live a meaningful life. Wu Ngai Ching, Ivy 20189319 Grade 21/25 ? 19/25 (due to 2-day late submission) Comments ?Ivy In terms of the main thesis of the essay, youve through a good job delineating your own atheist view on the meaning of life and pull 3 examples from the 2 works to discuss what m ight be the meaning of life for them.Your argumentation is quite an right and your analysis of e ach of their reaciton and thoughts on this difficult question is right on. ?However, you simply narrated through the exclusively essay without really giving detailed or c oncrete evidences from the book. I wish you could provide some passages or quotes from se veral particular moments in the book to clearly illustrate your point. This is one of the ways t o demonstrate that youve actually done the reading, and that is also what weve been doing in class making your point across by providing specific passages/instances in the book as c oncrete evidence. So please remember to do so for your final paper

Frankenstein - 1931 and 1997 Essay Example for Free

Frankenstein 1931 and 1997 EssayHorror genre, generosity for Frankensteins domain and misgiving Mary Wollstonecraft Shelly wrote Frankenstein in 1818. She was only 19 at the time. She had a unique upbringing as her m other(a) was a radical feminist and her father was a politician. She then went on to marry Percy Bysshe Shelly who was a poet and helped her to write some of her book. Shellys book was thought to be the first abuse/science fiction novel. in that respect have been a number of productions of Shellys novel on stage and in 1931 there was a portentous and white movie about it, directed by James Whale. Then in 1997, Kenneth Branagh did his own production of the well-known novel. Scenes showing typical horror genre, sympathy for Frankensteins creature and scenes that create suspense atomic number 18 norm aloney found in the two movies of Frankenstein. The directors have used different media techniques to portray the movie in the counsel they want it to be viewed a nd interpreted by their election of music, camera angles, special effects, editing, costumes, make-up, location and settings.The use of mise-en-scene is in addition important because if the things in the background dont match whats being acted the movie becomes unbelievable. Allowances like sound, colour and a a few(prenominal) other things have to be made for the older magnetic variations of Frankenstein because the technology in the days it was made were rattling limited. By studying the relationship scenes in both versions, the techniques used to create horror, drama and suspense and sympathy for the creature can be analysed. There are some similarities in both movies and some differences. startle of all Ill explain the similarities and then the differences. In the Whale and Branagh versions both use low-key spark to create a dark and spooky intuitive feeling. This is typical of horror movies and it can also create suspense because the audience cant tell what is around the corners. This creates suspicion, worry and uncertainty. It is also used because it connects with peoples fear of the dark. It is common to bring bad weather in horror movies and this is evident in both of the Frankenstein movies.It is used just onwards and at the same time of the births. Whale and Branagh have used this technique because it gives a cold feeling and it gives credibility to what is happening in the foreground because the lighting, electricity is needed to make Frankensteins nut come alive. The locations of the births are quite typical too. In the Whale version its in a castle on tip of a hill. Like House on haunted hill and it looks creepy and somewhere you would want to be. In the Branagh version its more like hell with cauldrons, heat and sweat.It reminds me of a witch brewing an evil poison. both places for the birth are effective in creating a horror atmosphere but the second choice is slight obvious. Non-diegetic, parallel fast background music can be heard in the birth scene in Branaghs version and this creates suspense because it gets peoples adrenalin going. But it is typically found in horror movies for this reason in particular. In the Whale version there is no music but this could be because of how old the movie is and it was hard to sequence the music with the scenes.In the Branagh version of Frankenstein one of the best ways sympathy is created for the creature is by the way he is presented to the audience. He looks almost human but has scars all over his face and body. It looks like someone who has been hurt badly and we feel sorry for him. On the other hand in the Whale version though its harder to feel sorry for Frankensteins monster because he looks less human and its harder to connect to him emotionally. In the Whale version Frankenstein is wearing a lab coat and his cop is gelled back.He looks more professional and like a proper doctor. This makes us feel sorry for Frankensteins public because it shows that Frankenste in just sees him as an experiment and not as a human being with feelings. Whereas in the Branagh version he looks more wild and rough looking. This gives us the feeling he does care about the result of the monster because he has been so busy trying to make the monster alive that he has forget about himself and when he thinks the monster is dead he goes No, No, No, implying that he is saddened that it didnt work.In Branaghs version of Frankenstein you feel consonant with the monster when he is born, as he is naked, clumsy, and unable to walk. Amniotic fluid is everywhere and we watch Frankensteins monster slide and slip about. He appears vulnerable, like a baby. He cant control what hes doing and Frankenstein has to help him. This makes us pity him. This contradicts with the Whale version as we dont get to see the monster moving about, trying to reach out or walk in the birth scene so we dont feel for him as much as he is still covered up and still practically lifeless.