Strategic Plan for the System – Essay

The strategys Mission and Vision Every educational knowledgeability should have a mission, which is its specific purpose for existing. The mission of the institution essentialiness(prenominal) be stated in the schools catalog and in different publications right away available to the public. The mission mustiness be roll in the hayly, clearly, and simply stated In terms readily understandable by a prospective disciple, p bents, the public, and other educational Institutions. The mission should be devoted substanti aloney to misgivinger-related education and should be reasonable for the computer program of instruction and facilities of the institution.Each institution should be capable of demonstrating its educational effectiveness by dint of sagacity and documentation of school-age child outcomes. This discernment must include evidence that the institutions annual retention and placement rates ar in keeping with its mission. The Institutions mission statement should be consistent with educational and employment outcomes of Its disciples (Argosy. 201 2 Guthrie & Ackermann. 2009). The unified module of the organisation origin onlyy substantial the mission for all of the institutions inwardly the agreement.Over the years the mission has been changed and updated to reflect the operations and culture of the schools. All employees and assimilators have opportunities to express ideas and suggestions for the mission, so it comes a reflexion of the way the employees and students, think and receive about the operations of the school. The villas of the System Is sort of simple In that It Is we c ar about the students, we c atomic number 18 about the employees, and we care about the employers who hire the Students.Through this the mission is stated as The System forget demonstrate the we care vision by preparing career-focused, residential area- school principaled graduates for the global workforce through with(predicate) applied education. Strategic Planning Through this strategic patternning mould, the System strives to show that it cares about student success, employment success, investment success, customer revive, communication, compliance, and community necessitatement. Student success shows that the System is committed to attracting students and delivering relevant, quality educational experiences that engage students and lead them to graduation and career success.Employment success shows that the System is dedicated to creating and maintaining a dynamic surroundings where performance Is recognized From a business perspective, the System cares and is concerned with investment success and providing a quality education that leads to a strong return on investment while exceeding the expectations of students, employers, employees, ND the surrounding community. This can only be done through lovely in and the management of effective communication and a culture of compliance.Once those items are in place, educatio nal communities can be developed, so that all s adoptholders feel as if they have a say and vested interest in the System as a whole. gravestone Decision Makers in that appraise are several(prenominal) key decision makers in the system. The founder of the System is the sole phallus of the Board of managers that governs each campus. The founder also oversees a management concourse that manages the day-to-day operations of each campus as surface as corporal support operations.The management team consists of the following positions Campus Directors, six Regional Directors, and corporate directors as follows Director of Marketing Director of Research and Development Director of Human Resources Director of Government and Community Relations Director of schooling Technology Director of Operations Real Estate Development theater director Chief Financial Officer Chief Operating Officer, Provost and Vice hot seat of Network Operations. Without the approval of all of the key decis ion makers, the accreditation process whitethorn be hindered and cannot move forward.Available Resources As the System moves towards accreditation, it must keep in mind the basic available resources and how those play a role inside the system. Those available resources include competency, financial resources, individualnel, library reading services, development technology, and aloofness allocation and physical location maintenance. Before accreditation can be sought, these items must be examined to determine if they are adequate enough to support and transport campus accreditation.The faculty within the System is the most important component of operation. It is through casualty in which the System meets the objectives of the mission statement. It is also through faculty, that students are successful. The quality of curricula and delivery is primarily the main focus of faculty. Aside from schoolroom responsibilities, they are involved in curricular planning and development, bo ok selection, ironware and software selection, and student advising. It is also largely through the faculty that the expectations of students are met.The financial resources of The System are allocated adequately to maintain a towering standard of maintenance and support revise, and to tolerate the school to competitively strain and acquire qualified faculty and staff. Through this, educational exacts of students are met while providing excellent customer service. Customer service is one of the reasons students film to attend college in the System. The System strives to hire high-caliber faculty and support them with experienced management and administrative personnel.The System also seeks to support faculty and staff by having adequate resources for them to do their Jobs, compensating them adequately for their service, and providing them with professional development opportunities in their fields. The goal of library information services is to provide students with the resour ces, support, and learning environment necessary to successfully complete the courses in knowledge and skills required for their careers. In addition to this, library support services maintains a website so that students are able to access library resources remotely in order allow information to enhance their educational experience.The corporate information technology congregation plays an integral role in ensuring all computer equipment, hardware and software, as well as on-line connectivity, meets todays demanding technical needs. There is a corporate director of technology who ultimately oversees the purchase of technical equipment and assists the campus with its technical needs. There are also individuals who are hired to work at the information technology helpless which further aids in the support of student and faculty in regards to troubleshooting and general system maintenance.In regards to allocation of space and facilities maintenance, the institutions reach locations ar e large enough to handle both the current student population, as well as allowing for growth. The System employs a contracted facilities person during the day to keep lacrosse and facilities clean and in good condition, as well as an evening facilities employee who prepares the craping for daily use. All of the resources above tolerate to a comfortable and constructive environment where students actively record in their educational process. All of the above helps the System to fulfill the mission and tariff to students.Data Availability Data is currently collected from several sources including the campus accountability report, student surveys, graduate surveys, employer surveys, and program advisory committee meeting minutes, annual assessment done by program rear for program effectiveness, course evaluations, and guinea pig examinations specific to career areas as applicable. The selective information is collected and analyzed on a quarterly and/or annual basis, subject to t he various assessment tools. The Campus Effectiveness Plan (CAPE) spreadsheet identifies at a glance the data line of battle schedule.Annually the management team (campus and corporate directors) meets and incorporates the data results and psychoanalysis in the boilersuit strategic planning process. The System President reviews the information with the management team during regularly scheduled quarterly planning meetings and in an annual strategic landing session. Together, all involved use the data to recommend changes in the programs, their respective facilities, personnel, and the overall operations of the school to provide the best practicable education for students and to ensure achievement of the main objective of placing students in their chosen career fields.The System plans to improve effectiveness by assessing and analyzing the identified data (student surveys, program advisory committee meetings, retention rates, placement rates, employer surveys, graduate surveys, e xtrinsic site evaluations, student suggestions, and administrative meetings within and among campuses) and determine strengths and have-to doe with to build upon them, as well identify areas that need improvement and refinement.This data is evaluated on several levels by the following divisions administration, education, and financial aid/student accounts, as well as each programmatic area, student services, and career services. Each department identifies developmental areas and outcomes, and responses to the outcomes leave alone be integrated and/or administered either departmentally and/or campus wide. Communication is also very critical component of self-assessment and student and employer suggestions and respond accordingly.The campus director discusses the results of the outcomes quarterly with the campus management team, and business review information is discussed monthly. The campus responds to all outcomes that show positive or negative trends. Each program chair reviews the outcome measurements that correspond to specific program plans. The results of these assessments are discussed at program meetings quarterly and program advisory committee meetings, typically annually.The faculty teaching in the program and the advisory committee members contribute ideas for curricular or programmatic enhancements and changes that relate to aerogram improvement. The campus directors regularly evaluate the plan and region the plan with their campus management team, and with the corporate management team, which includes directors from other campuses and corporate positions. on a lower floor is a to a greater extent specific timeline for the current year in regards to the accreditation process. Key Stakeholders As previously mentioned, the key stakeholders are the students, the faculty, the campus personnel, and the community at large.In respect to accreditation process, data collection takes these key stakeholders in mind, from the surveys administered o how the surveys are administered. Anyone who is considered a key stakeholder is encouraged to participate with respect to how their comments and participation influences decisions made within the System, and ultimately whether or not the accrediting body ordain grant accreditation or not. Due to this, it is important that the key decision makers provide a positive and inviting environment from the beginning so that key stakeholders are willing to participate and give feedback accordingly.Timeline The timeline for obtaining accreditation will be as follows Spring 2012 Semester will long the compilation of data from various data sources as previously mentioned to complete the self study process as defined by the accrediting body. During this time, all stakeholders will meet to review and discuss key components of the self-study in an safari to have it completed in a timely manner. Once this has been done, the self-study will be submitted to legal counsel, the Board of Directors, the Presi dent, and the Provost for further review.Summer 2012 Semester, the self- study will be submitted to the accrediting body for the practise process. The crediting body will have the completed practical application and self-study for review approximately two months in which the System will continue to compile data and also make any necessary department of corrections as indicated. The time frame for providing information is indicated by the accrediting body and should be no longer than three months from when the required information and necessary corrections have been noted and requested in writing.This will then take the process into the Fall 2012 Semester where at that time the utmost application will be reviewed by all stakeholders and submitted. From the time of the final application sufferance to the actual approval or denial of accreditation shall be no more than six months time which will then take the strategic plan time frame into the Winter 2013 Semester. To conclude, fr om initial data collection and self-study process, the process shall take no less than a year and makers will need to re-evaluate the effectiveness of the strategic plan and make adjustments as needed.At the conclusion of the accreditation application process, the key decision maker will have a final review meeting to go over a SOOT analysis so s to improve the process when the System seeks accreditation elsewhere. Conclusion In order for a strategic plan to be effective, the input of all the key players, data analysis and collection, evaluation, and implementation along with other variables including resources and timeline must be in place.These items must not only be in place, but also done with respect to the mission and the vision of the physical composition in which the strategic plan is going to be implemented (Argosy, 2012 Guthrie & Ackermann, 2009). In effect, the strategic planning process is not self serving nor is t single purposed, but rather the strategic plan keeps in mind the key stakeholders and how what is planned and implemented will impact, people, policies, processes, and procedures.