Frankenstein - 1931 and 1997 Essay Example for Free

Frankenstein 1931 and 1997 EssayHorror genre, generosity for Frankensteins domain and misgiving Mary Wollstonecraft Shelly wrote Frankenstein in 1818. She was only 19 at the time. She had a unique upbringing as her m other(a) was a radical feminist and her father was a politician. She then went on to marry Percy Bysshe Shelly who was a poet and helped her to write some of her book. Shellys book was thought to be the first abuse/science fiction novel. in that respect have been a number of productions of Shellys novel on stage and in 1931 there was a portentous and white movie about it, directed by James Whale. Then in 1997, Kenneth Branagh did his own production of the well-known novel. Scenes showing typical horror genre, sympathy for Frankensteins creature and scenes that create suspense atomic number 18 norm aloney found in the two movies of Frankenstein. The directors have used different media techniques to portray the movie in the counsel they want it to be viewed a nd interpreted by their election of music, camera angles, special effects, editing, costumes, make-up, location and settings.The use of mise-en-scene is in addition important because if the things in the background dont match whats being acted the movie becomes unbelievable. Allowances like sound, colour and a a few(prenominal) other things have to be made for the older magnetic variations of Frankenstein because the technology in the days it was made were rattling limited. By studying the relationship scenes in both versions, the techniques used to create horror, drama and suspense and sympathy for the creature can be analysed. There are some similarities in both movies and some differences. startle of all Ill explain the similarities and then the differences. In the Whale and Branagh versions both use low-key spark to create a dark and spooky intuitive feeling. This is typical of horror movies and it can also create suspense because the audience cant tell what is around the corners. This creates suspicion, worry and uncertainty. It is also used because it connects with peoples fear of the dark. It is common to bring bad weather in horror movies and this is evident in both of the Frankenstein movies.It is used just onwards and at the same time of the births. Whale and Branagh have used this technique because it gives a cold feeling and it gives credibility to what is happening in the foreground because the lighting, electricity is needed to make Frankensteins nut come alive. The locations of the births are quite typical too. In the Whale version its in a castle on tip of a hill. Like House on haunted hill and it looks creepy and somewhere you would want to be. In the Branagh version its more like hell with cauldrons, heat and sweat.It reminds me of a witch brewing an evil poison. both places for the birth are effective in creating a horror atmosphere but the second choice is slight obvious. Non-diegetic, parallel fast background music can be heard in the birth scene in Branaghs version and this creates suspense because it gets peoples adrenalin going. But it is typically found in horror movies for this reason in particular. In the Whale version there is no music but this could be because of how old the movie is and it was hard to sequence the music with the scenes.In the Branagh version of Frankenstein one of the best ways sympathy is created for the creature is by the way he is presented to the audience. He looks almost human but has scars all over his face and body. It looks like someone who has been hurt badly and we feel sorry for him. On the other hand in the Whale version though its harder to feel sorry for Frankensteins monster because he looks less human and its harder to connect to him emotionally. In the Whale version Frankenstein is wearing a lab coat and his cop is gelled back.He looks more professional and like a proper doctor. This makes us feel sorry for Frankensteins public because it shows that Frankenste in just sees him as an experiment and not as a human being with feelings. Whereas in the Branagh version he looks more wild and rough looking. This gives us the feeling he does care about the result of the monster because he has been so busy trying to make the monster alive that he has forget about himself and when he thinks the monster is dead he goes No, No, No, implying that he is saddened that it didnt work.In Branaghs version of Frankenstein you feel consonant with the monster when he is born, as he is naked, clumsy, and unable to walk. Amniotic fluid is everywhere and we watch Frankensteins monster slide and slip about. He appears vulnerable, like a baby. He cant control what hes doing and Frankenstein has to help him. This makes us pity him. This contradicts with the Whale version as we dont get to see the monster moving about, trying to reach out or walk in the birth scene so we dont feel for him as much as he is still covered up and still practically lifeless.